NIRSpec Sensitivity

Limiting sensitivity cases are available that describe faint target limits in which NIRSpec will be able to acquire S/N = 10 spectra in about 10 ks, for given instrument parameters in the fixed slit, IFU and multi-object spectroscopy observing modes.

On this page

The performance of NIRSpec has been measured directly from on-orbit data obtained during JWST instrument commissioning (Giardino et al. 2022). Results of the on-orbit throughput measurements have been incorporated into the JWST Exposure Time Calculator (ETC) sensitivity model, which accounts for background, photon conversion efficiency, encircled energy, and detector performance (Pontoppidan 2016). Relative to pre-launch predicted instrument performance, the NIRSpec on-orbit results show an increased sensitivity over most of the NIRSpec wavelength range, the level of which varies with observing mode. This article presents the instrument faint sensitivity for specific benchmark test cases using ETC version 4.0 involving the NIRSpec modes FS (S200A1 aperture), IFU and MOS corresponding to a point source with a continuum spectrum.

Users should ultimately use the Exposure Time Calculator (ETC)  for all signal-to-noise calculations. Information presented here is for graphical example. 



Limiting sensitivity in benchmark test cases

Limiting sensitivities for a point source benchmark test case for 3 NIRSpec observing modes are presented here: integral field unit (IFU), multi-object spectroscopy (MOS), and fixed slits (FS). The curves for limiting sensitivity define the flux to achieve S/N = 10 in about 10 ks at the presented wavelengths for each NIRSpec filter-grating configuration. The benchmark test parameters for each mode calculation are defined below.

Words in bold are GUI menus/
panels or data software packages; 
bold italics are buttons in GUI
tools or package parameters.

Target calculation parameters (common for all modes):

  • point source
  • flat continuum spectral energy distribution in frequency units (fnu)
  • 1.2 times minimum zodiacal background level (includes telescope background)

Detector readout parameters (common for all modes):

MOS parameters:

IFU parameters:

FS parameters:

  • slit S200A1
  • separate background exposure
  • single spectral pixel

Figures 1, 2, and 3 present the limiting sensitivity curves for the NIRSpec IFU, MOS and FS (S200A1) benchmark ETC cases.  Small gaps within the high-resolution (H) grating and medium-resolution (M, for MOS mode) grating data curves represent the wavelength gap between the 2 detectors. The gaps may be compensated by the use of multiple exposures using different subarrays.

Figure 1. Limiting sensitivity IFU (ETC V4.0)

The limiting sensitivity vs. wavelength from on-orbit data for the NIRSpec IFU using the multiple spectral configurations available in NIRSpec for spectral resolutions R = 2700 (upper), R = 1000 (middle) and R = 100 (lower).
Figure 2. Limiting sensitivity MOS (ETC V4.0)

The limiting sensitivity vs. wavelength from on-orbit data for the NIRSpec MOS using the multiple spectral configurations available in NIRSpec for spectral resolutions R = 2700 (upper), R = 1000 (middle) and R = 100 (lower).

Figure 3. Limiting sensitivity FS (S200A1 slit) (ETC v4.0)

The limiting sensitivity vs. wavelength from on-orbit data for the NIRSpec FS (S200A1) using the multiple spectral configurations available in NIRSpec for spectral resolutions R = 2700 (upper), R = 1000 (middle) and R = 100 (lower).




References

Giardino, G., Bhatawdekar, R., Birkmann, S. M. et al. 2022, arXiv:2208.04876
Optical throughput and sensitivity of the JWST NIRSpec

Pontoppidan, K. 2016, Proc of SPIE, 9910, 16
Pandeia: a multi-mission exposure time calculator for JWST and WFIRST 




Notable updates
  •  
    IFU, MOS, and FS limiting sensitivity figures replaced and text edited for ETC v4.0

  •  
    IFU, MOS, and FS limiting sensitivity figures replaced and text edited for ETC changes

  •  
    Figures updated to present instrument on-orbit performance
Originally published