Parent article: Near Infrared Spectrograph, NIRSpec See Also: NIRSpec Sensitivity, NIRSpec Bright Source Limits, JWST Exposure Time Calculators (ETC) Information presented in the NIRSpec predicted performance articles describes the best knowledge of performance based on instrument component and flight model tests carried out on the ground. The scientific performance of all of JWST's instruments will be measured during the commissioning period immediately after launch. The best estimates of the performance of all of JWST's instruments are incorporated into the JWST Exposure Time Calculators (ETC). The information provided on predicted sensitivity performance within these pages is only for general guidance. Measured onsky performance values will be incorporated into the ETCs and provided here as they become available. This NIRSpec predicted performance information here includes the articles: The calculation method for sensitivity, transmission of the combined optical element and the efficiency of the detectors is discussed below.
The ideal focal plane flux rate is derived from the surface brightness of the source with astronomical interest , the telescope collecting area (A) in cm^{2} and the dimensionless combined transfer efficiency of the OTE (primary, secondary, tertiary, and fine steering mirrors) LaTeX Math Inline 

body  (\eta_{OTE}(\lambda)) 

 . LaTeX Math Block 

anchor  GY4BE 

alignment  center 

 S_{\lambda}^{ideal} = A \times \eta_{OTE}(\lambda)\times I_\lambda 
where is in units of photons/sec/cm^{2}/μm/pixel.After the OTE, the flux is transferred through a specific instrument optics system. Instrument optics systems are a crucial telescope component that can be described by onedimensional (wavelengthdependent) efficiency curves (unity is perfect transmission). Each instrument/mode combination can have efficiency contributions from internal reflections and optical stops, filters, and dispersers. The actual focal plane flux rate is then: LaTeX Math Block 

anchor  5XXEP 

alignment  center 

 S_{\lambda}^{\rm focal\, plane} = S_{\lambda}^{\rm ideal} \times \eta_{\rm optics}({\lambda}) \times \eta_{\rm filter}({\lambda}) \times \eta_{\rm disperser}({\lambda}) 
in units of photons/s/μm/pixel. The faint sensitivity limits for the NIRSpec (for a specific benchmark calculation case) is described in the NIRSpec Sensitivity article. The signal to noise is derived from measurement of the number of incident photons measured by the end to end instrument, including the detector. This optical system transmission follows from the above equation via a detector quantum efficiency function (QE; see the lower curve in Figure 1). The QE curve assumes a quantum yield (QY) of unity at all wavelengths (the efficiency of a detector at converting an incident photon to a measured electron is 1.0). The optical transmission function is: LaTeX Math Block 

anchor  W5C7F 

alignment  center 

 S_{\lambda} = S_{\lambda}^{\rm focal\, plane} \times {\rm QE}({\lambda}) 
in units of e^{–}/s/μm/pixel. The optical transmission is presented in Figure 2 for the NIRSpec gratingfilter combinations using the both the MOS internal optics throughput and the IFU internal optics throughput. Investigation of bright saturation limits for the NIRSpec detectors is described in the NIRSpec Bright Limits article. The calculations presented in the bright limit case measure the number of electrons that accumulate in the detector, based on the incident photons. In this case, the photon conversion efficiency (PCE) is used to present overall system efficiency of detecting electrons and filling the detector well. Calculation of the PCE uses the detector relative quantum efficiency (RQE), which is the QE multiplied by the quantum yield of the detector. At wavelengths shortward of 1.4 μm, a single incident photon can result in more than one electron measured on the detector. This results in a RQE greater than 1.0, as presented in the upper panel of Figure 1. The PCE is: LaTeX Math Block 

anchor  6IA0O 

alignment  center 

 PCE_{\lambda} = S_{\lambda}^{\rm focal\, plane} \times {\rm RQE}({\lambda}) 
in units of e^{–}/s/μm/pixel. The PCE is shown in Figure 3 for the MOS and the IFU internal optics throughputs. Figure container 

Figure title 

Figure 1. NIRSpec detector quantum efficiency (QE; top), relative quantum efficiency (RQE; bottom) 
Figure caption 

The upper plot presents the NIRSpec quantum efficiency (QE) as a function of wavelength expressed in units of e^{–}/photon. Maximum efficiency is unity. The QE curve assumes a quantum yield (QY; efficiency of a detector at converting an incident photon to a measured electron) of unity at all wavelengths. The lower plot presents the relative quantum efficiency of the detector, RQE. This is the product of the QE and the quantum yield. At wavelengths shortward of 1.4 μm the RQE is greater than 1.0 because an incident photon can result in more than one measured electron on the detector. 

Figure container 

Figure title 

Figure 2. NIRSpec optical transmission function 
Figure caption 

The NIRSpec transmission function for a set of gratingfilter combinations for the MOS observing mode (upper plot) and the IFU observing mode (lower plot). The vertical axis shows the product of the efficiency of the filter, the efficiency of the grating, the efficiency of the MOS or IFU configuration, and the detector quantum efficiency (QE) as a function of wavelength expressed in μm. 

Figure container 

Figure title 

Figure 3. NIRSpec photon conversion efficiency function 
Figure caption 

NIRSpec photon conversion efficiency (PCE) for a set of gratingfilter combinations for the MOS observing mode (upper plot) and the IFU observing mode (lower plot). The vertical axis shows the product of the efficiency of the filter, the efficiency of the grating, the efficiency of the MOS or IFU configuration, and the detector relative quantum efficiency (RQE; including quantum yield) as a function of wavelength expressed in μm. 

