Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Content Block
overflowauto
meta-propertiestrue
nameSummary
id277319516
classpdf-full

The JWST NIRSpec multi-object spectroscopy (MOS) mode uses nearly 250,000 configurable micro shutters to form slitlets for simultaneously collecting spectra on multiple science targets.


Content Block
overflowauto
nameContent
id277805920
classpdf-full

Introduction

Parent articleNIRSpec Instrumentation

The JWST NIRSpec MOS observing mode uses a micro-shutter assembly (MSA) that is comprised of nearly 250,000 configurable micro-shutters that can be opened in columns in the cross-dispersion direction to form spectral "slitlets." These MSA spectral slitlet configurations create the MOS slit masks, and allow for simultaneous collection of dozens to hundreds of target spectra. The MSAs were fabricated at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.


Properties of the MSA

The NIRSpec MSA has four quadrants of configurable shutters. These are labeled quadrants 1 to 4, as seen in Figure 1. Each quadrant is comprised of 365 shutters in the dispersion direction (the vertical direction in Figure 1) and by 171 shutters in the cross-dispersion direction (horizontal direction in Figure 1). The total extent of the MSA quadrants is approximately 3.6' × 3.4'. There are gaps of approximately 18" (in the dispersion direction) and 37" (in the cross-dispersion direction) between the four MSA quadrants. Each quadrant has an active region of ~95" × 87" where shutters are available for source placement.  All dimensions provided above are averages, based on laboratory measurements on the ground.  

Figure container
Figure title

Figure 1. Detailed diagram of the MSA

Detailed diagram of the MSA

Figure caption

An illustration of the MSA with details of its layout, the individual shutters, and the magnetic arm. The quadrants are mounted on a metal frame that also contains the IFU aperture and fixed slits. This MSA quadrant hardware view is rotated by 90° counter-clockwise compared to the on-sky science view presented in the NIRSpec MOS mode article.

Each shutter has an open area of approximately 0.20" × 0.46", with an ~0.069" separating wall on all sides. This gives a total shutter pitch (center-to-center distance) of ~0.27" in the dispersion direction and ~0.53" in the spatial (cross-dispersion) direction. The shutter walls extend away from the shutter door, in the direction from which light enters, creating a “shield” to minimize shutter-to-shutter contamination and a “crate” for the shutter door to open into (see Figures 2 and 3).

In the MSA shutter configuration, all shutters are opened by sweeping the magnet arm across the MSA from bottom to top for the view shown in Figure 1. Then, the shutters are left open or closed during a return sweep, from top to bottom, of the moving magnetic arm. Shutters that are configured open are latched in place by an electrostatic charge on the sidewalls of the shutter crate until they are reconfigured. Each shutter has a row electrode and a column electrode so that it may be addressed individually, allowing a tailored slit mask for each observation. The planning of MSA observations is done to minimize slitlet reconfigurations in order to maximize the operational lifetime of the MSA hardware.  

Figure container
Figure title

Figure 2. Detailed diagram of two MSA shutters

Figure caption

A view of two micro-shutters that are part of the MSA. Details of their layout are shown. In this figure, light enters from the bottom, goes through the open shutters and moves onto the selected disperser.

Figure container
Figure title
Figure 3. Close-up photo of MSA shutters

Figure caption

A microphotograph showing the MSA shutters from the light input side. The shutters that are commanded open or closed are on the bottom. (Compare with Figure 2.)


Anchor
shutters
shutters
MSA inoperable shutters

See also: NIRSpec MOS Recommended Strategies

The MSA has some shutters that are inoperable. Some MSA shutters are permanently "failed closed," some are purposely "masked closed" to prevent damage from shutters with electrical shorts, and some MSA shutters are permanently "failed open." 

  • Failed closed shutters: These comprise ~10%–15% of the total number of shutters. They simply do not open when commanded. Failed closed shutters do not degrade the obtained science spectra, but do cause an inconvenience during configuration planning, and a decrease in MOS multiplexing. Failed closed shutters restrict the possible locations of science target slits and can limit the area that is available to use for target acquisition (TA) reference stars.
     
  • Masked closed shutters: There are also a few dozen shutters with electrical shorts, caused by the complexity of the closely-packed shutter circuits. To protect the MSA from unsafe currents, a shorted shutter must be removed from the circuit path by masking out its entire row or column in the affected quadrant. These masked shutters, like the failed closed shutters, are unavailable during configuration planning for science or TA. 
     
  • Failed open shutters: These shutters either do not close when commanded or have no shutter door. These failed open shutters are always open to the sky and always acquire spectra. They pose a risk of contamination for NIRSpec MOS and IFU mode science because spectra from a source or background that falls in the aperture will always be collected. The failed open shutters are more detrimental to spectral MOS multiplexing and data quality than failed closed shutters, because failed open shutters prevent use of other open science shutters in a row of the MSA. When planning MOS slitlet configurations, the locations of science target slits will be limited to those that have no spectral overlap with failed open shutters. In the IFU observing mode, these failed open MSA shutters can be mitigated by dithering, by moving targets to new locations in the IFU field (and on the detector), or by acquiring IFU leakage correction exposures to remove the detrimental flux effects.

Many of the MSA shutter characteristics have been calibrated in ground tests and will be monitored after launch. The location of failed open, failed closed, and shorted shutters will be updated in the observation planning software. 

Figure 5 also reveals several very low level ghosts (<0.01%) on detector NRS1 to the left of the MSA quadrants. When dispersed, this ghost emission is blue-ward of MOS mode spectra and is not expected to affect science performance.

Anchor
failed_closed
failed_closed

Figure container
Figure title
Figure 4. Failed and masked closed shutters in the MSA

Failed and masked closed shutters in the MSA

Figure caption

The four MSA quadrants, as imaged onto the NIRSpec detectors, when commanded to "all open." The black points show failed closed shutters and the thin black lines show shorted columns and rows. The thicker black lines between and around the quadrants are part of the background and do not represent failed closed shutters.

Anchor
failed_open
failed_open

Figure container
Figure title
Figure 5. Failed open shutters in the MSA

Failed open shutters in the MSA

Figure caption

Exposures to test the contrast of the MSA were taken in imaging mode with the shutters configured to "all closed."  These long exposure images with a flat field lamp reveal prominent bright spots, which are the shutters that are permanently failed open. Extremely low level ghosting (<0.01%) is seen to the left of the four quadrants. The image flux scaling is exaggerated to enhance the low level contrast emission.


Anchor
msa_leakage
msa_leakage
MSA flux leakage

See also: NIRSpec MSA Leakage Subtraction Recommended Strategies

Ground testing of the NIRSpec MSA revealed that the shutters have a flux leakage problem (Figure 6) where light from bright field illumination can pass through closed MSA shutters at specific locations. This is the same issue that is discussed in NIRSpec MSA Leakage Correction for IFU Observations. Figure 6 shows the flat field images acquired with all MSA shutters configured closed to measure contrast (also shown in Figure 5), and overplotted is a zoomed region in MSA quadrant 4 that shows a very regular grid-like structure to the contrast illumination pattern. The precise instrument model knowledge of where the MSA shutters were located was compared with the image of  illumination structure shown in Figure 6.  As a result, it was determined exactly where the excess leakage flux comes from in the shutters.

Figure 7 shows a zoomed view of an MSA shutter, centered at (0, 0) in x and y coordinates. This is a super-sampled map of the leakage flux from the MSA; the color scale shows where the shutters are extremely opaque (blue) and where a moderate amount of flux leaks through to the spectrograph (red). The colors presented are relative flux levels, and the red color corresponds to a leakage level (measured closed flux ⁄ measured open flux) of ~0.004%. The average leakage structure is very regular and repeatable across most shutters in the MSA. The map in Figure 7 reveals that the majority of the MSA flux leakage arises from the location of the the bar separating shutters in the y direction (cross-dispersion direction). Additional investigation is being carried out to understand the origin of this MSA flux leakage problem.

Although the flux leaking through an individual MSA shutter is less than 1 part in 10,000, the leakage is a cumulative effect from the over 700 MSA shutters in the dispersion direction. As a result, the MSA flux leakage can accumulate to a level that is closer to 1 part in ~50 (2%), on average. Figure 8 presents a dispersed NIRSpec prism flat field image that shows science-like slitlet configuration, plus the elevated flux level from MSA flux leakage. The excess flux from the MSA leakage can affect background flux levels MOS mode observations, but the available NIRSpec MOS nod offset options can help to subtract excess flux from science observations. Additionally, the MSA flux leakage can affect the sensitivity of IFU observations, so the concept of IFU leakage correction exposures was adopted to mitigate the issues. The MSA Leakage Subtraction Recommended Strategies article discusses different strategies for different science cases.

Figure container
Figure title

Figure 6. MSA flux leakage structure

MSA flux leakage structure

Figure caption

A zoomed view of the data acquired to determine the opaqueness of the MSA reveals very regular structure within the contrast map. The image flux scaling is exaggerated to enhance the low level contrast emission.

Figure container
Figure title

Figure 7. Map of the NIRSpec shutter leakage

Map of the NIRSpec shutter leakage

Figure caption

This figure highlights how excess light passes through the MSA at particular locations. The black rectangles represent MSA shutters, and the color scale presents the opaque regions of a shutter (blue) to the regions that are less opaque (red). This structure is very regular and repeatable across most shutters in the MSA.

Figure container
Figure title

 Figure 8. Dispersed NIRSpec MSA flux leakage

Dispersed NIRSpec MSA flux leakage

Figure caption

This flat field calibration ground test exposure shows NIRSpec prism-mode spectra in science-like "slitlet" configurations. Also highlighted is the MSA flux leakage which can cause an accumulation of low level background flux. The spectral flux scaling is exaggerated to enhance the low level leakage emission.




Content Block
overflowauto
nameReferences
id281944791
classpdf-full

References

NIRSpec Multi-Object Spectroscopy 
Presentation by T. Boeker at ESAC JWST "On Your Mark" Workshop, 26-28 Sep. 2016.

Kutyrev, A.S., Collins, N., Chambers, J. et al. 2008 SPIE, 7010, 70103d
Microshutter arrays: High contrast programmable field masks for JWST NIRSpec


Content Block
overflowauto
nameIcon
id278719485
classpdf-hide

Multiexcerpt include
MultiExcerptNameNIRSpec icon and Name
PageWithExcerptMR:NIRSpec icon and name


Content Block
nameUpdates
id1074221578
classpdf-hide


HTML Wrap
padding0
margin0
idupdatesbox


HTML Wrap
tagspan
classupdatesbox-heading

Last updated

Updated January 18, 2018

  • updated gap sizes based on current best information


Published May 12, 2017


 

Comment

The format for 'Last updated' is shown below. Enter updates above this internal"Comment" box. Only enter major updates (not typos or formatting changes).


Updated April 05, 2017

  • Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aliquam fermentum vestibulum est. Cras rhoncus. 
  • Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Sed quis tortor. 

Published March 02, 2017