NIRSpec MPT - Planner

The JWST MSA Planning Tool main interface is presented and described in detail. All steps to create a plan containing targets, slitlet structure, dithering strategies, and exposure configuration are discussed.

On this page

The NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool (MPT) is the official software tool to design a NIRSpec MOS observation.  The main purpose of MPT is to optimally plan micro-shutter assembly (MSA) observations, given source positions and the limitations of the MSA. Constraints, such as the bars in between shutters and the inoperable shutters, are fully accounted for in MPT.  MPT contains the precise coordinate transformation between the MSA plane and the sky plane, taking into account the distortion of the combined optical path of the telescope and NIRSpec optics.

An overview of the MPT Planner

The purpose of the MPT Planner1 is to allow the user to define parameters that are the input of the algorithms that produce the final pointingsMSA configurations, and target sets.  An "MSA configuration" is defined as a set of open and closed micro shutters in the MSA.  Once a set of Planner parameters are defined, a Plan can be generated. Observers can generate several Plans which are saved when they save their APT file.  After assessing the quality of individual Plans, the user can then select one or more Plans from which observations will be made.  When an observation is generated, see NIRSpec MPT - Plans, the observation template in APT is automatically completed for the user.  One Plan in the MPT Planner is used to create one observation in APT.

For MPT to work, the user must be connected to the internet so MPT can check whether an aperture position angle is feasible when the user begins to create a plan.

The appropriate selection of the Planner parameters discussed throughout this article depends on science goals. Consult NIRSpec MOS Recommended Strategies for further advice. For examples of how the choices below affect the results of the Planner, see the Parameter Space article. Parameters and their values are designated using bold font italics throughout this article.

After having ingested a Catalog with sources of interest and creating a Primary candidate set (and a Filler candidate set, if desired), the user should move on to the Planner tab in the MSA Planning Tool. The Planner is shown in Figure 1. 

Reminder:  If you are not seeing the MPT, make sure you are in the Form Editor view (click the top left button in the APT GUI window), and that you have highlighted the Observation Folder in the tree on the left side of the APT GUI window.

Figure 1. MPT Planner

NIRSpec MPT: Planner, Video 1: Aperture PA and Candidate Lists

Bold italics style indicates words that are also parameters or buttons in software tools (like the APT and ETC). Similarly, a bold style represents menu items and panels.

MPT Section 1: Manual Planning and Planning Angles  

Manual Planning

The MPT Planner is designed to automatically create optimal plans but it is also possible for the user to create plans manually by selecting a pointing and clicking MSA shutters open and closed. Checking the Manual Planning checkbox at the top of the window puts the planner into the manual planning view. For information about the fields shown in this view see NIRSpec MPT - Manual Planner.

Aperture PA (APA)

A given NIRSpec MSA observation must be executed at a specific telescope orientation angle so that the selected sources will fall into the open shutters as planned.  Because of the telescope's orbital position and sunshield constraints, a given orientation may only be possible for limited periods during the year or not available at all.  The Target Visibility Tools can be used to determine the range of feasible orientation angles for a target throughout the telescope's orbital cycle.

For most NIRSpec MOS observations, it is recommended to experiment with several different feasible Aperture Position Angles prior to initial proposal submission. The submitted APA is used to create place-holder or "planning visits" with MPT. Once a proposal is accepted, it will be assigned a fixed orientation and a corresponding window of time when observations will be made. 

For proposal submission, use any feasible APA from the orientation angles provided by the JWST Target Visibility Tool for the time of observation. For final program submission, use the fixed orientation APA that has been assigned to your observation by the schedulers at STScI. This assigned angle will correspond to one or more plan windows for execution in the scheduling timeline.

The APA (an angle between 0 and 360 degrees) specifies the orientation of the cross-dispersion axis of the MSA aperture measured from North in the counterclockwise direction. Figure 2 shows how this angle is measured on the sky. The "Y" axis represents the cross-dispersion direction of the MSA.

Figure 2. Aperture position angle

The black arrow represents the North direction. The blue arrows represent the direction of the Ideal X and Y axes. Dispersion is along the "X" axis. The Aperture Position Angle (θ) is shown as measured in the sky.

Programs that have an orientation or timing special requirement added to the observation can restrict scheduling opportunities. Most NIRSpec MOS programs should be submitted without added orientation restrictions, in order to allow the schedulers to find suitable windows for them. Also, when the proposal is submitted, the observer should explicitly add an "ON HOLD for aperture position angle assignmentspecial requirement to their NIRSpec spectroscopy observations.

True angle to target

The True angle to target field appears in the Planner, but is greyed out and cannot be changed by the userThis is the angle between the telescope's velocity vector at the center of the planning window and the telescope pointing.  It is used to make small corrections to source positions at the MSA resulting from the velocity of the spacecraft.

The True angle to target offers a quick way to check target visibility:  its value will not update if the selected APA is not feasible.

MPT Section 2: Candidate lists

The MPT is designed to create plans that use two levels of priority for science sources:  a "Primary" candidate list, and a "Filler" candidate list.  These lists are created from the input Catalog that was uploaded following the instructions in the article NIRSpec MPT - Catalogs.

The tool will attempt to maximize the number or the summed weight of Primary sources in the configurations it derives.  Therefore, these sources will directly influence the pointing selection for both fixed and dithered observations. The Primary candidate list is required to generate a plan in MPT.  At the derived best pointings, MPT will use the (optional) Filler candidate list to fill available areas in the MSA configuration, to observe more sources in each exposure. There is no attempt by the algorithms to complete the sources from the Filler list (i.e. to observe them through all dithers) in the same way that the primary sources are completed. Fillers do not define the pointings, they are only selected to maximize MSA usage. Only the Primary candidate sets determine the selected pointings.

Observers should be aware that they should have all sources of interest in a single parent catalog for a given observation or a set of observations. The candidate lists (Primary Candidate List and Filler Candidate List) are derived from this single Catalog. Using Primary candidates from one Catalog and Fillers from a different parent Catalog will cause save errors in APT.  Users will not be able to make observations from Plans made with candidate lists derived from different Catalogs.

MPT Section 3: Slit Setup

In this section the user defines the shape of the slitlet and the Source Centering Constraint.

NIRSpec MPT: Planner,  Video 2:  Slit and Dither Setup


The NIRSpec MSA is composed of ~250,000 micro shutters. By commanding open micro shutters, it is possible to create longer slits (in the cross-dispersion direction only) which are referred to as "slitlets". There are four selectable Slitlets of differing length, and their structure depends on the number of adjacent micro shutters that are open: 1, 2, 3, or 5.   The spectrum from a slitlet will be segmented, with bar shadows between the individual shutters making up the slitlet.

Only one default Slitlet shape and Source Centering Constraint (see below) may be selected for a given plan.  Each selected target in a Plan will be observed with the same slitlet shape using the same source centering constraint in an Observation designed with MPT. The Manual Planner can be used to append a new set of targets to existing MSA configurations using a different slit shape or centering constraint

Slitlets of any size may be created, modified, or deleted using the Manual Planner. The Manual Planner can be used from scratch to design a custom MSA configuration with slits of different lengths for different size sources, however it is important to be careful about nodding in the slitlet when slit lengths differ in the same MSA configuration. It is also possible to pass MSA configurations designed with the automatic MPT planner to the Manual Planner for modification there.

The yellow and black sketch in the Planner, shown in Figure 3, illustrates the options for slitlet length. 

Each open micro shutter, when projected onto the sky, has dimensions of only 0.2" in the dispersion direction by 0.46" in cross-dispersion. These are the internal (open) dimensions. Each shutter is bordered by a bar of width ~0.069", which vignettes a small area of the sky around it. In any given exposure, a particular source may fall anywhere inside a given shutter, or behind the bars. The position of the source with respect to the shutter will affect its observed flux. 

Figure 3: Options of available NIRSpec MOS Slitlet shapes

The available MOS Slitlet shape options are: one, two, three, and five shutters. Open shutters are shown in yellow. These are the only slitlet lengths that are available. If longer slitlets are needed, the Manual Planner can be used to design an MSA configuration.

Source Centering Constraint

The Source Centering Constraint in the Planner presents five increasingly limited choices for the shutter margin to constrain the positioning of the source within the shutter to help reduce slit losses. As shown in Table 1, the larger the margin, the more limited the area available for centering the source.  In general, larger margins result in fewer selected targets, although this effect depends strongly on the source density of the Primary candidate list.

The default constraint is the Entire Open Shutter AreaThe figures in column two of Table 1 represent a single micro shutter.  The yellow area represents the area available to a potential target corresponding to the indicated Source Centering Constraint.  The exact dimensions of the constrained area are not precise, they are just suggestive.  The actual applied source centering constraint can be seen as a dashed white line when viewing the "Collapsed Shutter View" in an MOS exposure.

To be included as a successful source in a plan, the source center must fall within the central area of the shutter defined by the specified margin. A more restrictive shutter margin will limit the photometric error, but may also cause the overall efficiency of the plan to drop. This parameter is relevant primarily for point sources, which can suffer from large photometric inaccuracies due to limitations in the pointing accuracy, especially if a source happens to be centered near the shutter edge where the throughput drops quickly.  The shutter margin translates to a minimum possible slit transmission of a point source relative to a perfectly centered point source (column 3 of Table 1), anchored at 2.95 μm. Of course, the actual throughput will depend on the wavelength of the observation and the source shape (point vs. extended).

Users observing extended sources should avoid over-constraining the shutter margin since source centering is less critical, and it could decrease the overall number of targets observed per MSA configuration. 

Table 1
. Source centering options within an individual micro shutter.  

Column two shows a sketch of the open micro shutter area (yellow area) for each margin; the black surface represents the margin.  

Source Centering ConstraintFigure Minimum Relative Flux Transmission at 2.95 μm




(sources can be behind the MSA bars)



Entire Open Shutter Area (default)

30% 38


62% 59


75% 72

Tightly Constrained

85% 91

 The source centering constraints were updated in APT 25.4 according to the most precise knowledge of the average shutter dimensions. The path losses at these margins are for a point source. They were measured at 2.95 μm, relative to a perfectly centered source. At larger wavelengths, the PSF is broader, and the slit losses are greater than that of a point source, however the relative slit losses for different constraint margins are less discrepant. The sketches shown in this table are representative only and may not reflect the actual sizes. The margins shown in the last column are measured from the mid-bar position inward, toward the center of the shutter.

As a result of the tiny size of a micro shutter, moderate flux can be lost outside of the shutter. Slit losses depend not only on the location of the source in the slit, but also the wavelength, since the point spread function (PSF) increases with wavelength as shown in Figure 4. The "relative flux transmission" value in the table is the minimum percentage of flux at 2.95 μm that makes it through the MSA shutter, compared to a perfectly centered point source

Figure 4. Slit losses and wavelength

The NIRSpec PSF at five wavelengths. The rectangle is the size of a micro shutter. Slit losses and total transmission depend critically on wavelength. The throughput can be affected by diffraction at the aperture edges. These effects depend on the location of the source within the shutter.

MPT Section 4: Dither Setup

In this section, the observer can define dither and nodding patterns for the observation. Most JWST observations will require dithering and NIRSpec users are encouraged to make use of this feature. Not only is dithering critical for improving the sampling, but it can help to estimate and remove light leakage through the MSA's finite contrast shutters in MOS mode.  In this mode it is not easily possible to take leakcal exposures as for IFU mode.  More information on the advantages of dithering can be found in the article NIRSpec MOS Dither and Nod Patterns.

The telescope can be repositioned slightly between exposures to place the targets into different shutters within their respective slitlets in an MSA configuration. This is called nodding. If nodding is selected (by clicking the checkbox Nod in Slitlet in the Planner), the same MSA configuration will be used to observe the target once in each open shutter in the slitlet.  

When nodding is selected, the default pipeline will automatically perform a background subtraction using the various nod positions.

Note that this action increases the number of exposures.  Generally, there will be one nod position per slitlet shutter. In the 5-shutter slitlet, there is also the possibility of only 3 exposures, with nod positions in the central, uppermost and lowest shutters only.  This option, called exposures per configuration is visible only when the 5 Shutter Slitlet and the Nod in slitlet options are selected.In addition to nodding, which moves the telescope very slightly, users have the ability to add larger, or primary, dithersPrimary dithers will require a reconfiguration of the MSA in order to re-observe the same targets. The algorithm used to perform dithers is called the Fixed dithers algorithm.  Dithers are specified in units of integer shutters in the dispersion and/or spatial direction, and represent average offsets to apply to the next pointing. The dither algorithm accounts for relative distortions between pointings, so dithers of any size can be specified.

For each new dither that is added to the Pattern table in APT, a new primary pointing will result, along with an associated MSA configuration. This will result in an additional exposure (or set of nodded exposures). The number of (MSA) configurations needed to execute the entire set of dithers is computed and displayed beneath the table of dithers shown in the GUI. 

Dithering  options

No dither (None)

Select this option if dithering is not desired. Note that dithering is highly recommended for JWST observations. More information on the advantages of dithering can be found in the articleNIRSpec MOS Dither and Nod Patterns.

Fixed dither

This dither pattern consists of offsets in the dispersion direction and/or in the cross-dispersion direction. There is no limit to the size of the dither that may be specified, but larger dithers may naturally result in some loss of targets due to diminished areal overlap of sources in the quadrants at very large separations.

The Fixed Dither algorithm currently yields only completed sources (i.e. observed at all dither points). Partially-observed sources are not included in the plan. For that reason, adding Fillers helps to fill the MSA. Also, adding the Primary sources into the top of the Fillers list may help to produce observations of additional Primary sources.  Optionally, the Manual Planner can be used after the fact to add in slitlets to the MSA configuration(s) designed with MPT to observe additional sources.

To create a pattern, simply click the ADD button and define the offsets. Offsets are in units of micro shutters. Figure 5 shows the default parameter values when the window is opened for the first time.

Figure 5. Fixed dither parameters window

MPT Section 5: Exposure Setup

NIRSpec MPT: Planner,  Video 3:  Exposure Setup, Search Grid, and Parameters

In section 5 of Figure 1 the observer defines the exposure specification. In the table in this section, each new exposure specification results in one or more new exposures.  The number of new exposures resulting from a single exposure specification (or, each row in this table) is determined by the dither pattern specified (see Section 4). Click the ADD button to add a new exposure. An exposure is configured by setting the Grating/Filter combination, the Readout Pattern, Number of Groups, and Number of Integrations, described in Table 2. The ETC uses these parameters as input and produces associated exposure times and signal-to-noise (SNR) estimates.

Users should ultimately use the Exposure Time Calculator Old for all sensitivity calculations.

Recommendations about exposure parameter selection are given in NIRSpec Detector Recommended Strategies.

Table 2. Description of Science Parameters for a given exposure

Exposure ParameterDescription
Grating/FilterSelect a grating/filter combination from the pull down menu. The article NIRSpec Dispersers and Filters describes all the available combinations for NIRSpec observing modes.
Readout Pattern

Each exposure consists of a set of one or more integrations. Integrations consists of a set of nondestructive reads of the detector.  

The detectors can be read in different ways. The available patterns are NRS, NRSRAPID, NRSIRS2, and NRSIRS2RAPID. These patterns are described in full detail in the article NIRSpec Detector Readout Modes and Patterns. The default pattern is NRS.

Select the pattern that best suits your observation.


The number of groups in an integration. The number of groups, together with the Readout Pattern (i.e. the number of frames in a group) will determine the length or duration of an integration, using the specified options for averaging or not averaging frames.

Integrations/ExpThe number of integrations comprising an exposure, where an integration is defined as a set of non-destructive reads.
AutocalThis option is available to automatically add calibration exposures to a science exposure.  For the MOS, the options are NONE, WAVECAL, FLAT, and BOTH. NONE is the default and is recommended.
ETC Wkbk.Calc IDThe user should enter the ETC calculation ID from the associated ETC Workbook. See note below.

Exposures may be reorganized and removed if necessary, by using the Duplicate, Insert Above, and Delete buttons.

The ETC calculation ID from the associated ETC Workbook should be entered for each exposure in the exposure specification table before generating a Plan. There is currently no other way to add this information at a later stage. Its is expected this will be fixed in APT 28.0.

The main purpose of multi-object spectroscopy is to obtain the spectra of many sources simultaneously. The incoming light passes through a long pass filter before it goes through the slitlet in the MSA, and is dispersed by the chosen grating onto the detector. The MSA Planning Tool is designed to prevent spectra from overlapping on the detector, including second order spectra, typically allowing just one source per row for a given open shutter.  This is certainly useful when dealing with high resolution gratings. However, in some limited science cases, overlapping spectra can be tolerated. The checkbox Multiple Sources per Row (as shown in Figure 6) is offered to optionally allow for overlap in these cases. 

Figure 6. Exposure Setup showing the "Multiple Sources Per Row" option

The behavior of the Multiple Sources Per Row option depends on the choice of dispersing element or elements. In the case where the Prism is used exclusively, the Multiple Sources Per Row option is not available. The Prism allows multiple sources per row by default because the spectra do not extend beyond ~500 pixels in the dispersion direction. In the case of a grating, or a grating plus the Prism in the same Plan, the behavior of the Multiple Sources Per Row checkbox is summarized in Table 3.

Table 3. Using the "Multiple Sources Per Row" Option

Grating option"Multiple Sources Per Row" Selected ?Description
Any gratingYesHigh (R-2700) and medium (R-1000) resolution grating data are allowed to overlap spectrally. A separation as small as 4 shutters in dispersion is allowed. Spectra will overlap.
PRISM + grating(s)NoGratings drive the multiplexing and no spectra will overlap (including the short Prism spectra).
PRISM + grating(s)YesThe multiplexing will always be driven by the Prism. This will result in overlap of grating spectra if the Prism + gratings are planned together.

Note that currently, the more efficient PRISM-style multiplexing described in the last row of the table above is not working in rows near failed open shutters, and is also not being applied to Fillers. These problems are expected be fixed in APT 28.0 or later.

MPT Section 6: Search Grid

The Fixed Dither algorithm (discussed above in section 4), starts by constructing a grid of test pointings on the sky.  The grid is aligned with the orientation of the dispersion and spatial axes of the MSA. For each point, the algorithm attempts to find the maximum number of high-priority sources that can be observed given the constraints of the MSA. As part of this process, the tool avoids inoperable shutters and will not allow overlapping spectra, unless specified.

The total number of observed sources, or the sum of their weights (if Weights are used in planning, see below) are tallied and saved at each test pointing. The result is called a "heat map". The heat map is used internally, but is not a delivered product.

Following the heat map creation, the two algorithms work differently to derive the best pointings on the sky. There are a few critical parameters in both algorithms that affect the computational time needed to create a plan. The size of the Primary Candidate List, the number of MSA configurations, and the number of grid points are the most relevant.

In this section of the MSA Planning Tool the user defines the size of the search grid, its Center, and the Search step size mentioned above as shown in Figure 7. The entire extent (Center RA and Dec, the Width and Height) of the input Catalog at the specified Aperture Position Angle is used to define the area over which test pointings are examined. The default value of Search Step Size is 30". If the default grid spacing value is changed, the tool will re-compute the number of grid points that will be searched, and will display the result next to the selected spacing as shown in Figure 7.  Normally, reducing the step size will improve target numbers. Grid step sizes in the range of 2" - 12" give similar plan results in many fields, for typical source densities.  Even reducing to a step size as small as 1/3 of a shutter width (~85 milli-arcsec) may provide improved results, but at the expense of computational time and memory.

The Search Step Size can dramatically affect the time it takes to compute a Plan. A lower value will increase the number of pointings to be tested. A higher value will decrease the number of pointings. The number of pointings in the grid is calculated and displayed next to the selected Search Step Size. Keeping the search grid to less than 10,000 total pointings is advised for MPT plans to run in a reasonable amount of time on most computers.

Search grids that subtend RA = 0.0 cause MPT to fail. This is expected to be fixed in APT 28.0 or later. A workaround is to break up the source catalog and plan separately.

Figure 7. Search Grid parameters window

These parameters are editable by the observer in case they want to limit the search area, or move it to a particular region on the sky. The defined area should typically be within the area covered by the dither pointings.

Note that a fixed single pointing plan may be obtained by setting Width = Height = 0.0 arcsec.

The parameters Width and Height are measured in units of arcsec along the MSA aperture X and Y axes as shown in Figure 2.  Typically the values provided by MPT will suffice, but it is sometimes useful to visualize the footprint of the MSA at a specific position using Aladin, the viewer provided by APT, when choosing these search grid parameters. There are additional drawing tools in Aladin that could help determine appropriate values for these search grid parameters.

After invoking Aladin from APT, note that the default view in the APT GUI changes from Form Editor to View in Aladin. In order to return to the MPT, click on the Form Editor at the top left of the main APT window and make sure the correct Observation Folder is selected or highlighted.

MPT Section 7: Other Plan Parameters

Section 7 of the MSA Planning Tool is where the last remaining parameters are defined, the plan is named, and finally generated. 

Table 4. Additional Planning Parameters

Plan Name

A user-defined name for a Plan. Use a meaningful name for each plan. An APT file can contain several plans and will save them.

The Plan name will become the name of the Observation if one is created from the Plan and it will NOT be possible to later change the name of the Observation.

Use Weights
If this option is selected, the MSA Planning Tool will reorder the Primary Candidate List based on weight and will select pointings that observe the highest sum of source weights. Typically, weights are present as a column in the input catalog, and are inherited by the Primary Candidate List as explained in the article NIRSpec MPT - Catalogs
In the absence of weights (or given equal weights), MPT will prioritize targets based on their order in the Primary Candidate List.
Enable Monte-Carlo
If the user chooses to enable Monte Carlo shuffling, the tool will attempt to optimize the number of targets observed in an MSA configuration by shuffling the Primary Candidate List before selecting targets. The number of Monte Carlo trials can be adjusted by the user. The default is 10 trials. The results of all trials are evaluated and the best result is selected. Figure 8 shows the advantages of enabling Monte Carlo shuffling.

Figure 8. Advantages of Monte Carlo shuffling

Re-ordering the Primary Candidate List at a given pointing can increase the number of targets observed at that pointing.  The planning tool will save the option that gives the most sources.

Random shuffling is applied independently at each test pointing when Monte Carlo shuffling is enabled. Monte Carlo shuffling works best with intermediate-sized primary lists. It needs enough sources in the dispersion direction to select from while attempting to pack the MSA more efficiently.

There are a few unintended bugs when "Use Weights" and "Monte Carlo shuffling" are used. This is expected to be fixed in APT 28.0.

(1) Use Weights should first sort the sources by descending weight in order to place the most highly weighted sources into the MSA configuration, but the weights of those placed into the MSA at each search grid point will be used to help determine the best result. This option can be used as is, but the fix, when it comes, should improve results.

(2) If weights are present in the Catalog, Enable Monte Carlo will always sort sources by weight after shuffling them (even when Use Weights is turned off), which will undo the shuffling if all sources have unique weights. This option should not be used unless multiple sources in the catalog have the same weight.

Number of Configuratons

The number of MSA configurations to generate.

If Number of Configurations is left blank, then MPT will calculate as many MSA configurations as required to completely observe all the Primary Candidates. If this is not desired, make sure to choose a valid number of configurations.

When dithers are specified, the MSA Planning Tool computes the number of MSA configurations needed to observe at all primary dither points to complete the plan for one target set.  To observe additional target sets, simply specify a multiple of the minimum number needed to complete one target set.

The tool will guide users by indicating the factor they need to multiply by to obtain more target sets. If a value larger than the minimum is specified, the planning tool will simply attempt to create more target sets from the designated Primary and Filler lists. The new target sets will have the same dither pattern but will have different pointings than the first target set.
For example, if a user elects a 3-point primary dither in their plan by adding 2 fixed dithers, the plan will require 3 MSA configurations for each target set it produces. The user may choose to design 3, 6, or 9, 12, etc. MSA configurations. Each multiple of 3 MSA configurations will produce 1 target set because it takes 3 MSA configurations to complete all the planned dithers for each target set. Primary targets that have been observed in previous MSA configurations associated with another target set derived in the plan will be excluded before attempting to create a new target set. 

Generating a Plan

After the plan parameters are fully specified, plan generation is begun by clicking Generate Plan.   While the MPT is generating a plan, a dialog window shows the progress.  The length of time it takes to generate a plan depends on the number of points searched (shown by the search grid parameters) and the number of science sources in the Primary and Filler Candidate Lists.  

Note that it is possible to start generating a MPT plan that will take an extremely long duration to create. Keep the number of search grid pointings to <10,000 and the number of catalog sources below 20,000 for MPT plans that will take a reasonable amount of run-time on most computers.
It is recommended to save your APT session before and after generating your plan, and often thereafter as you generate more plans or create new observations.

If users wish to stop plan generation once started, the stop button can be clicked in the pop-up progress window.  This will stop the MPT at a point in between the creation of MSA configurations, and it will populate the MPT: Plans area with the truncated plan. Once the Plan is generated, APT will automatically display the results in the Plans pane (NIRSpec MPT - Plans) where the proposer can examine planning results to assess the quality of the plan.

In order to return to the Catalog or Planner panes, simply go to the top of the window and select from one of the three tabs shown.


Karakla, D. et al. 2014, Proc. SPIE 9149
The NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool for multi-object spectroscopy with JWST



Latest updates
    Added video 2: Slit and dither setup
    Added video 3: Exposure setup, search grid, and parameters