- JWST Cycle 1 Proposal Opportunities
- James Webb Space Telescope Call for Proposals for Cycle 1
- •JWST Cycle 1 Proposal Checklist and Resources
- •JWST Cycle 1 Proposal Policies and Funding Support
- JWST Cycle 1 Proposal Categories
- •JWST Cycle 1 Observation Types and Restrictions
- •JWST Cycle 1 Proposal Preparation
- •JWST Cycle 1 Single-Stream Proposal Process
- •JWST Cycle 1 Special Submission Requirements
- •JWST Cycle 1 Observation Mode Restrictions
- •JWST Cycle 1 Proposal Selection Process
- •JWST Cycle 1 Awarded Program Implementation
- •JWST Cycle 1 Proposal Science Categories and Keywords
- JWST Director's Discretionary Early Release Science Call for Proposals
- •JWST DD ERS Notice of Intent to Propose
- •JWST DD ERS Proposal Checklist
- •JWST DD ERS Program Goals, Project Updates, and Status Reviews
- •JWST DD ERS Proposal Policies
- •JWST DD ERS Preparatory Funding Budget Requirements
- •JWST DD ERS Funding and Institutional Endorsement
- •JWST DD ERS Observation Types and Restrictions
- •JWST DD ERS Special Observational Policies
- •JWST DD ERS Special Submission Requirements
- •JWST DD ERS Proposal Process
- •JWST DD ERS Proposal Preparation
- •JWST DD ERS Proposal Evaluation and Selection Procedures
- •JWST DD ERS Proposal Science Categories and Keywords
- JWST Cycle 1 Guaranteed Time Observations Call for Proposals
- •JWST Cycle 1 GTO Proposal Submission Policies
- •JWST Cycle 1 GTO Proposal Submission Process
- •JWST Cycle 2 and 3 GTO Proposal Process
- JWST GTO Observation Specifications
- James Webb Space Telescope Call for Proposals for Cycle 1
- JWST General Science Policies
- • JWST Observing Overheads and Time Accounting Policy
- • JWST Duplicate Observations Policy
- • JWST Science Parallel Observation Policies and Guidelines
- • JWST Observing Program Modification Policy
- • Policies for the Telescope Time Review Board
- • JWST Target of Opportunity Program Activation
- NASA-SMD Policies and Guidelines for the Operations of JWST at STScI
- •Policy 1 - Limitations on the Use of Funds for the Research of General Observers and Archival Research
- •Policy 2 - Data Rights and Data Dissemination
- •Policy 3 - Data Requests and Facilities
- •Policy 4 - Post-Launch Commissioning of JWST
- •Policy 5 - Clarification of Extensions of Exclusive Access Data to Public Affairs Activities
- •Policy 6 - Distribution of JWST Science Data Obtained from Investigations Other Than Those Selected Through the Peer-review Process
- •Policy 7 - NASA Needs for Support for Other Missions
- •Policy 8 - Definition of Observing Time
- •Policy 9 - Allocation of Guaranteed Observing Time to Scientists Selected Under AO 01-OSS-05 and Through NASA-ESA-CSA Agreements
- •Policy 10 - Redistribution of Guaranteed Observing Time Among Observers
- •Policy 11 - Protection of Science Programs Associated With Guaranteed Time
- •Policy 12 - Education and Public Outreach
- Methods and Roadmaps
- JWST Imaging
- • JWST Slit Spectroscopy
- • JWST Slitless Spectroscopy
- JWST High-Contrast Imaging
- •Contrast Considerations for JWST High-Contrast Imaging
- •JWST Coronagraphic Observation Planning
- •JWST Coronagraphic Sequences
- •JWST Coronagraphy in ETC
- •JWST High-Contrast Imaging in APT
- •JWST High-Contrast Imaging Inner Working Angle
- •JWST High-Contrast Imaging Optics
- •JWST Small Grid Dither Technique
- •MIRI-Specific Treatment of Limiting Contrast
- •NIRCam-Specific Treatment of Limiting Contrast
- •NIRISS AMI-Specific Treatment of Limiting Contrast
- •Selecting Suitable PSF Reference Stars for JWST High-Contrast Imaging
- JWST Integral Field Spectroscopy
- JWST MOS Spectroscopy
- JWST Time-Series Observations
- •Overview of Time-Series Observation (TSO) Modes
- •Noise Sources for Time-Series Observations
- •Sensitivity of Time-Series Observation Modes
- •Bright limits of Time-Series Observation Modes
- •Preparing Time-Series Observations with JWST
- •Target Acquisition for Time-Series Observations
- •NIRCam-Specific Time-Series Observations
- •NIRISS-Specific Time-Series Observations
- •MIRI-Specific Time-Series Observations
- JWST Moving Target Observations
- •Field of Regard Considerations for Moving Targets
- •Instrument-Specific Considerations for Moving Targets
- •JWST Moving Target Calibration and Processing
- •JWST Moving Target Ephemerides
- •JWST Moving Target Observing Procedures
- •JWST Moving Target Policies
- JWST Moving Targets in APT
- •JWST Moving Targets in ETC
- •JWST Moving Target Useful References and Links
- •Overheads for Moving Targets
- •Moving Target Recommended Strategies
- JWST Parallel Observations
- • JWST Target of Opportunity Observations
- • General Proposal Planning Workflow
- Observatory Functionality
- • JWST Position Angles, Ranges, and Offsets
- • JWST Instrument Ideal Coordinate Systems
- JWST Background Model
- • JWST Guide Stars
- • JWST Mosaic Overview
- • JWST Dithering Overview
- JWST Duplication Checking
- JWST Observing Overheads and Time Accounting Overview
- •JWST Observing Overheads Summary
- •JWST Slew Times and Overheads
- JWST Instrument Overheads
- Observing Overheads for NIRCam Imaging
- • JWST Data Rate and Data Volume Limits
- Observatory Hardware
- • JWST Observatory Overview
- • JWST Observatory Coordinate System and Field of Regard
- • JWST Field of View
- • JWST Orbit
- JWST Spacecraft Bus
- • JWST Pointing Performance
- • JWST Telescope
- • JWST Wavefront Sensing and Control
- • JWST Momentum Management
- • JWST Integrated Science Instrument Module
- • JWST Solid State Recorder
- • JWST Target Viewing Constraints
- • Fine Guidance Sensor, FGS
- Astronomers Proposal Tool
- • JWST Astronomers Proposal Tool Overview
- • APT Proposal Information
- APT Targets
- • APT Observations
- • APT Visit Splitting
- JWST APT Coordinated Parallel Observations
- • JWST APT Pure Parallel Observations
- • APT Target Acquisition
- JWST APT Mosaic Planning
- • APT Special Requirements
- • APT Visit Planner
- • JWST APT Aladin Viewer
- • APT Smart Accounting
- • JWST APT Target Confirmation Charts
- • APT Submitting Your JWST Proposal
- JWST APT Functionality Examples
- • JWST APT Help Features
- • JWST APT Training Examples and Video Tutorials
- Other Tools
- Mid Infrared Instrument
- • MIRI Overview
- MIRI Observing Modes
- MIRI Instrumentation
- MIRI Operations
- MIRI Target Acquisitions
- MIRI Dithering
- MIRI Mosaics
- •MIRI MRS Simultaneous Imaging
- MIRI Time Series Observations
- MIRI Predicted Performance
- MIRI APT Templates
- MIRI Observing Strategies
- MIRI Example Programs
- •MIRI Coronagraphy of GJ 758 b
- MIRI and NIRSpec Observations of SN1987A
- •MIRI and NIRCam Coronagraphy of the Debris Disk Archetype around Beta Pictoris
- •MIRI IFU and NIRSpec Observations of Cas A
- Near Infrared Camera
- • NIRCam Overview
- NIRCam Observing Modes
- NIRCam Instrumentation
- •NIRCam Field of View
- •NIRCam Modules
- •NIRCam Optics
- •NIRCam Dichroics
- •NIRCam Pupil and Filter Wheels
- •NIRCam Filters
- •NIRCam Coronagraphic Occulting Masks and Lyot Stops
- •NIRCam Filters for Coronagraphy
- •NIRCam Grisms
- •NIRCam Weak Lenses
- NIRCam Detectors
- NIRCam Operations
- NIRCam Dithers and Mosaics
- •NIRCam Coronagraphic PSF Estimation
- •NIRCam Coronagraph Astrometric Confirmation Images
- •NIRCam Apertures
- NIRCam Target Acquisition Overview
- NIRCam Predicted Performance
- NIRCam APT Templates
- NIRCam Observing Strategies
- NIRCam Example Programs
- NIRCam Imaging and NIRISS WFSS of Galaxies Within Lensing Clusters
- •NIRCam Coronagraphy of HR8799 b
- •NIRCam Deep Field Imaging
- NIRCam Grism Time-Series Observations of GJ 436b
- NIRCam Time-Series Imaging of HAT-P-18 b
- •NIRCam WFSS Deep Galaxy Observations
- •NIRCam and MIRI Coronagraphy of the Debris Disk Archetype around Beta Pictoris
- Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph
- • NIRISS Overview
- NIRISS Observing Modes
- NIRISS Instrumentation
- NIRISS Operations
- NIRISS Predicted Performance
- NIRISS APT Templates
- NIRISS Observing Strategies
- NIRISS Example Programs
- NIRISS WFSS and NIRCam Imaging of Galaxies Within Lensing Clusters
- NIRISS AMI Observations of Extrasolar Planets Around a Host Star
- NIRISS SOSS Time-Series Observations of HAT-P-1
- Near Infrared Spectrograph
- NIRSpec Overview
- NIRSpec Observing Modes
- NIRSpec Instrumentation
- •NIRSpec Optics
- •NIRSpec Dispersers and Filters
- NIRSpec Detectors
- •NIRSpec Micro-Shutter Assembly
- •NIRSpec Integral Field Unit
- •NIRSpec Fixed Slits
- NIRSpec Operations
- NIRSpec Dithers and Nods
- NIRSpec MOS Operations
- NIRSpec IFU Operations
- •NIRSpec FS Operations
- •NIRSpec BOTS Operations
- NIRSpec Target Acquisition
- NIRSpec Predicted Performance
- NIRSpec APT Templates
- NIRSpec Multi-Object Spectroscopy APT Template
- •NIRSpec MOS Proposal Checklist
- •NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool, MPT
- NIRSpec MPT - Catalogs
- •NIRSpec MPT - Planner
- NIRSpec MPT - Manual Planner
- •NIRSpec MPT - Plans
- •NIRSpec MPT - Parameter Space
- •NIRSpec MSA Spectral Visualization Tool Help
- •NIRSpec Observation Visualization Tool Help
- •NIRSpec IFU Spectroscopy APT Template
- •NIRSpec Fixed Slit Spectroscopy APT Template
- •NIRSpec Bright Object Time-Series APT Template
- •NIRSpec FS and IFU Mosaic APT Guide
- NIRSpec Multi-Object Spectroscopy APT Template
- NIRSpec Observing Strategies
- •NIRSpec Background Recommended Strategies
- •NIRSpec Bright Spoilers and the IFU Recommended Strategies
- •NIRSpec Detector Recommended Strategies
- •NIRSpec Dithering Recommended Strategies
- •NIRSpec MOS Recommended Strategies
- •NIRSpec MSA Leakage Subtraction Recommended Strategies
- •NIRSpec Target Acquisition Recommended Strategies
- NIRSpec Example Programs
- NIRSpec and MIRI Observations of SN1987A
- •NIRSpec and MIRI IFU Observations of Cas A
- NIRSpec Bright Object Time Series Observations of GJ 1214b
- NIRSpec MOS Deep Extragalactic Survey
- •NIRSpec MOS Observations of NGC 346
- Understanding Data Files
- Obtaining Data
- Data Processing and Calibration Files
- JWST Data Reduction Pipeline
- • Primer and Tutorials
- • Pipeline User's Guide
- • Software Reference Documentation
- Algorithm Documentation
- • Obtaining and Installing Software
In planning any JWST coronagraphic observation, the following steps should be followed:
Choose which instrument(s), filter(s) and coronagraph(s) based on the observer's science goals, and to some extent on the contrast and separation of the science target (e.g. disk, low-mass companion). When assessing feasibility, observers may need to use models to extrapolate shorter wavelength measurements to 3–23 µm, for instance to determine companion contrasts at MIRI wavelengths from far infrared or submillimeter wavelengths—e.g. from Herschel, Spitzer, IRAC, etc. Additionally, the user will want to use the JWST Coronagraph Visibility Tool (CVT) to examine the target's visibility and available position angles versus time.
- Select a PSF subtraction strategy. The recommended standard sequence is 2 rolls on a science target, followed by a PSF calibrator, all observed back-to-back in sequence.
- Calculate the necessary exposure times using the JWST Exposure Time Calculator (ETC) coronagraphic capabilities. You may want to upload custom spectral models for cool substellar atmospheres.
- Select a PSF reference star (See Selecting suitable PSF reference stars for JWST High Contrast Imaging). This should be based on proximity, brightness, spectral type match, and avoidance of binaries.
- Set up observations in the Astronomer's Proposal Tool (APT); assess overheads and total program time; iterate as desired. It is important to consider significant overheads: slews and rolls, guide star acquisitions, target acquisitions, etc.
Characterizing the brown dwarf GJ 758 b
In this science use case, we will observe the brown dwarf companion GJ 758 B using all 3 of MIRI’s four-quadrant phase mask (4QPM) coronagraphs . GJ 758 B is one of the coldest sub-stellar mass companions imaged to date. Ground based near-IR photometry and spectroscopy have confirmed an effective temperature of ~700K, and identified a methane-rich atmosphere. Its host, GJ 758, is within close proximity (~19pc) and is a G9 spectral type star. Multi-epoch coronagraphic imaging indicates an edge-on eccentric orbit, with the companion moving towards the projected star at a projected ~100 mas/year. While cooling-track-derived masses place this object above the purported deuterium-burning limit, It is an important benchmark since its orbit is favorable for the future determination of its dynamical mass using astrometry or radial velocity. A thorough characterization of its atmospheric properties will provide a key reference point to compare to field substellar objects of similar temperatures. Moreover, understanding its composition will answer fundamental questions regarding the formation of such rare objects (using "metallicity" as a proxy).
The goals of this program are to:
- Characterize the atmosphere of this cool benchmark brown dwarf at long wavelengths.
- Measure effective temperature and atmospheric ammonia absorption.
- Compare to atmospheres of field brown dwarfs and combine with existing shorter wavelength data to retrieve atmospheric properties in detail.
Associated APT File for this Science Use Case: GJ_758_MIRI_Coronagraphy.aptx
We will use all three four quadrant phase masks (FQPMs) of MIRI to obtain 10.65, 11.4 and 15.5 micron photometry on this sub-stellar companion. This will allow us to obtain continuum fluxes, temperature, and ammonia absorption. For each FQPM filter, we will follow the recommended coronagraphic standard observing sequence: executing two rolls on the science target (i.e a roll-dither) and one observation of the PSF reference star. Because the companion is moving closer to the star in projected separation, with an expected separation of 1” (~2 λ/D at 15 μm) by 2019, we will use the Small Grid Dither (SGD) technique in combination with the KLIP algorithm to build an optimal PSF reference for subtraction from each integration of our observations.
Choosing a PSF reference star for GJ 758 B
Our science target, GJ 758, is a spectral type G9 star with a K magnitude of 4.49 and celestial co-ordinates of 19 23 + 33 13. Following the MIRI Coronagraphic Best Practices: Choosing a reference PSF target guidelines, we are looking for a PSF reference calibrator that is:
- Relatively nearby (to ensure scheduability and minimal slew time – which in turn minimizes thermal changes to the telescope and thus changes to the PSF)
- Closely matched in spectral type (less critical at MIRI wavelengths, because the FQPM filters are relatively narrow, but still good to have)
- Close in magnitude (allowing shorter exposure time on PSF star – especially helpful given our choice to use SGDs)
- Is non-binary (and so will appear optically single at JWST resolution)
Searching SIMBAD, we find that HD 190360 (=GJ 777 A) will serve as a good reference as it is nearby (RA: 19 23 Dec: 33 13, i.e., ~9 degrees separation from our science target), has spectral type G7 with K mag = 4.08, and it is a known RV planet host star with extensive observations that rule out binarity. (It does have a suspected co-moving companion red dwarf GJ 777 B, but at a very wide separation that places it outside of the MIRI coronagraphic field of view entirely.) We note that HD 190360 is itself a known exoplanet host star, with a 1.6 MJup planet in a 4AU orbit and is an inner Neptune-mass planet. Neither planet can be spatially resolved by JWST, with projected separations <1 lambda/D at MIRI wavelengths. Furthermore, the estimated age of this star is > 6–7 Gyr, putting the Jovian planet below MIRI's detection floor.
For our overall program, we'll be making observations in the three 4QPM filters: F1065C, F1140C and F1550C. We note that there is a degree of freedom involved in the ordering of activities in programs that constitute of observations of the same target in multiple filters: for our program we will be choosing to sequentially expose in each filter between spacecraft maneuvers (slews and rolls) in order to minimize overheads. Note that this re-ordering of visits can (slightly) trade efficiency against temporal proximity of the PSF calibrators and science targets in the same filter (see JWST Coronagraphic Sequences and MIRI Coronagraphic Best Practices).
- Slew to the target (1800s)
Observe Science target in F1065C (576s science exposure, total time 2218s)
- Observe Science target in F1140C (576s science exposure, total time 1935s)
- Observe Science target in F1550C (863s science exposure, total time 2155s)
- Roll observatory ~10deg
- Observe Science target in F1065C (576s science exposure, total time 2984s)
- Observe Science target in F1140C (576s science exposure, total time 1935s)
- Observe Science Target in F1550C (863s science exposure, total time 2155s)
- Slew to PSF star (830s)
- Observe PSF star using a SGD in F1140C (1773s science exposure, total time 3850s)
- Observe PSF star using a SGD in F1065C (1773s science exposure, total time 3723s)
- Observe PSF star using a SGD in F1550C (2655s science exposure, total time 4632s)
Note that the total time is dominated by overheads: slews, target acquisition procedures etc. As such, the program contains 2.84 hours of science time and 7.85 hours of total charged time (including all overheads and observatory indirects), according to APT 220.127.116.11.
There are three observatory tools that you will want to utilize for coronagraphic observational planning, these are the: JWST Coronagraph Visibility Tool (CVT), JWST Exposure Time Calculator (ETC) and Astronomer's Proposal Tool (APT) — with recommended usage in that order. The CVT and ETC play crucial roles in the planning of any coronagraphic observations with JWST and must be utilized before crafting your actual observing program into APT. We refer the reader to the JWST Coronagraphic Observation Planning page for the procedures and strategies for planning coronagraphic observations with JWST.
Using the Coronagraph Visibility Tool
For our science case, we will use the Coronagraph Visibility Tool (CVT) to ensure that the requested orientations on the coronagraph mask avoid placing the companion along any FQPM quadrant boundaries and that the desired roll angle is a possibility over the visibility period. (See also: JWST Position Angles, Ranges and Offsets).
The companion's PA in the middle of cycle 1 (epoch 2020.0) will be ~215 degree. Following the CVT step by step guide, within the control panel: we resolve GJ 758 with SIMBAD (and cross-reference the SIMBAD ID, RA and Dec) and specify our brown dwarf companion at a PA and separation of 215 degree and 1", respectively. We specify that we'll be using the MIRI instrument with the MIRIM_CORON1065 mask and ask the CVT to plot the Aperture PA.
- Define our range of PA to be between 165–175 degree for our first observations in each filter, which positions the companions in quadrant 2 well away from the 4QPM boundaries. This 10 degree range yeilds about a 10 day scheduling window.
- Set our aperture PA offset between the two observations in each filter to the range 11–12 degrees, which is near the maximum available roll.
- Because we have decided to use a scheduling window that places the the companion in quadrant 2, we can leave the TA in the default quadrant within the APT (i.e. 1).
It's worth noting, that for this particular science case, the choice of scheduling opportunities is not expected to be available in 2019 since day 200 will be during commissioning; thus we would notionally expect such a program to execute in July 2020, about 9 months into cycle 1. Obervers should carefully take such scheduling constraints into consideration when planning their programs. In some cases, it may be necessary to add more scheduling flexibility to a program by considering alternate scheduling windows (here for example, we could use the windows near day of the year 110 or 290).
Using the Exposure Time Calculator
In order to set up our calculations in the ETC, we will first need to define a single scene in which to associate our sources within the Scenes and Sources page. Once the scene has been created, it should be populated with three sources: one associated with GJ 758, the second associated with GJ 758 b and the third associated with the PSF reference star.
We enter our source properties into the ETC as follows:
|Spectral Energy Distribution (SED)||Spectral type/ Teff/ Gravity||Bandpass||Brightness||X||Y|
|GJ 758 (target star)||Synthetic stellar spectra from Phoenix stellar models||K0V |
log g = 4.5
|Bessel K||4.5 vega||Point||0"||0"|
|GJ 758 B (companion)||User supplied spectrum, synthetic spectra from the Saumon et al. 2012 dwarf models||T8 |
log g = 4
|Bessel H||18.16 vega||Point||−0.72"||0.72"|
|PSF star (copy of GJ 758)1||Synthetic stellar spectra from Phoenix stellar models|
|Bessel K||4.5 vega||Point||10"||10"|
1Note that while we will formally be using GJ 777 A as our PSF reference target, we have defined our PSF reference star as a copy of our target star, GJ 758. This is because the ETC requires the reference star to have identicle brightness to the host star, otherwise it will return un-physical, negative SNRs.
We can now proceed to the calculations page and begin performing our calculations. For the purposes of this excersize we will perform 4 calculations: target acquisition on the star and MIRI coronagraphy on the companion in each of the three 4QPM filters.
The JWST ETC MIRI Target Acquisition article may be helpful when setting up the calculation dedicated to TA. The star can be defined as the acquisition target using the Strategy tab. Because the target is bright, we will need to use the ND filter to prevent the star from saturating the detector during the subarray exposures used for the target locates. Because it affects the accuracy of the centroiding procedure, the ETC will not tolerate any saturation – If any pixels are found to be either partially or fully saturated the TA will fail. The user should find a suitable exposure specification, such that the minimum required SNR of NGROUPS is obtained. Any calculations returning a SNR below this threshold will produce a "TA may fail" warning. We recommend the user takes the time to determine the best exposure configuration to optimize their SNR (Tip: proceed by varying NGROUPS in the detector setup – try to strike a balance between high signal-to-noise and low exposure time. You may find MIRI Coronagraphic Best Practices useful.)
Our results can be used as a cross-reference and are as follows: we find that a high SNR acquisition can be obtained with groups = 45, which yields SNR~260. Given MIRI's pixel scale this high SNR should allow centroiding to 1 mas or better. The exposure time is only 10 s. We checked there is no danger of saturation, which would only happen for exposure times > 100 s. Since there is high SNR and plenty of leeway in the dynamic range we can use the same TA settings for the PSF star too without needing a separate ETC calculation.
We proceed by creating calculations for coronagraphy on GJ 758 B in each FQPM filter; this is done by selecting GJ 758 B as the SNR source in the extraction strategy tab and then the appropriate coronagraph in the instrument tab. Each calculation will share the same observation strategy: with only the Referenced Differential Imaging (RDI) PSF strategy available with the ETC, we must choose the PSF subtraction source to be our defined PSF star (copy of GJ 758b) and set the scene rotation to 0. Our extraction strategy will also be consistent throughout the equations: with an aperture radius of 0.45; Sky annulus inner and outer radii of 0.45" and 0.7", respectively; contrast azimuth of 45 degree ccw and contrast seperation of 1".
Again, we strongly encourage users to take an oppertunity to determine an optimal exposure configuration for each equation on their own. However, for your reference, we make the following findings and considerations:
In F1065C and F1150C an exposure time of ~ 600 s yields predicted SNR ~ 35 and 60 respectively in one roll, or ~ 50 and 85 combined across the two rolls. As our key goal is to compare the 10.65 and 11.4 μm measurements to measure the NH3 absorption, we use the same readout settings in both filters to minimize systematics between them. We note that these are the optimistic photon-noise-limited SNRs, and in practice systematics from imperfect PSF subtraction and other calibrations (e.g. overall photometric calibration of MIRI) will also contribute limits, plausibly at a level of a few percent; by aiming for photon-limited SNR > 50 in the roll-combined data we seek to ensure the statistical photon noise is low enough to be below the likely systematic noise terms. In F1550 with the much higher thermal background an exposure time of ~900 s yields predicted SNR ~ 17 in one roll, or 24 in the two rolls combined, which is sufficient for our science goals in constraining the long-wavelength continuum.
For F1065 and F1150 we adopt 575 s (Groups = 300, Ints = 8 with FAST readout of the coronagraphic subarrays). For F1550 we increase the Ints by 50% to partially make up for the higher thermal background. The specific exposure settings chosen were verified in the ETC to not produce any warnings. In 300 groups the peak pixel will remain < 25% of full well so there is no danger of saturation. (Saturation warnings do not appear until above NGROUPS = 1200). As noted above each filter is repeated in two observations at different rolls.
The PSF star is 0.4 mag brighter than the science target (=45%; checked at both 2MASS and WISE bands), so we adjust the integration time to be 1/1.45 ~ 0.68x as long in each filter, to achieve similar peak count per integration in the PSF star as in the science target. Since we are using the 9- point SGD option, we also reduce the number of ints per dither position by 2x to keep the total exposure time from becoming excessive ("excessive" taken to mean PSF exposure time > = 2x the total on-source science exposure time summed across the two rolls). Since the full set of PSF calibrator dither positions is combined to generate the KLIP eigenbasis, we do not need to achieve the same SNR per each individual dither position as on the science target. Specifically we expect the SNR of the PSF relative to the science target to be between 1/sqrt(2), for individual dither positions, and 3*sqrt(2), for the combined KLIP reference library mean PSF mode.
Implementing into APT
We will now discuss how to implement this program into the APT. We encourage that you read the JWST APT article and its related links to familiarize yourself with its functionality. We assume that the user has reviewed these articles and therefore understands how to construct a basic JWST observing propsal (including how to add targets, observations and visits, use observation templates and folders etc.), as well as how to run the Visit Planner, Smart Accounting and Aladin. Further help with APT training or problem resolution can be found in the JWST APT Help Features and JWST APT Training Examples and Video Tutorials articles.
Our program consists of two fixed targets: the science target star HD 182488 (i.e., GJ 758) and PSF reference star HD 190460. We use the APT fixed target resolver tool to look up both targets from their Archival names and commit them to our proposal (which will auto-populate their J2000 Coordinates). We then enter the following information into the targets' templates:
Name in Proposal
|Catagory||Description (key words)||Proper motion3||Epoch||Annual parallax (arcsec)|
|RA (mas/yr)||Dec (mas/ yr)|
|1||GJ 758 (target star1)||Star||Exoplanets, G stars, Substellar companions||84.3||162.3||2000.0||0.0645|
|2||HD 190360 (PSF reference1)||Star2||Exoplanets, G stars||683.94||−524.7||2000.0||0.6306|
1Adding designations in the "Name in the proposal" field to clearly indicate which targets are intended for science and which are PSF-reference stars, can be particularly useful down the line!
2Note that we are assign the "PSF reference" target the "Star" catagory. You may be tempted to choose the "calibration" catagory, however this is not appropriate; remember that at this stage you are defining an astrophysical object within a target entry form, and this object is fundementallty a star. Indicating that this star will be used for PSF calibration purposes will come later in the observation description, since it is a propperty of the observation, and not a propperty of the astrophysical object itself.
3You can obtain the proper motion of the targets from SIMBAD.
The comment box is available within the target form for any freehand information; here we chose to mention the spectral type and K magnitude for each star, for future reference.
Because we are conducting a non-interruptable sequence of obserations at a single epoch, we can collect all of the osbervations that pertain to our program into a single observation folder (see previous Observing Desription). We will create a total of 9 observations. We recommend appropriately labeling the observations so that they can be easily identified in the observation folder. They are as follows:
- Observation of target GJ758 in F1065C at roll angle 1
- Observation of target GJ758 in F1140C at roll angle 1
- Observation of target GJ758 in F1550C at roll angle 1
- Observation of target GJ758 in F1065C at roll angle 2
- Observation of target GJ758 in F1140C at roll angle 2
- Observation of target GJ758 in F1550C at roll angle 2
- PSF reference observation of target HD 190360 in F1065
- PSF reference observation of target HD 190360 in F1065
- PSF reference observation of target HD 190360 in F1065
While you may begin crafting these observations in any order, it is essential that you provide the "Observation number" for each observation as stated above (i.e. organized according Observing Strategy we previously devised). This is because within the APT, observations occur according to increasing observation number.
Obviously, MIRI will be chosen as the instrument for each of these observertions and we can use the MIRI Coronagraphic Imaging template. The appropriate target for each observation template should then be selected. We recommend fleshing out the observation templates for the three science target observations in each filter at roll angle 1 (i.e. Obs. #1-3), initially; which allows for the oppertunity to "duplicate" each of these observation templates to produce identicle templates, which can then be used for the science target observations in each filter at roll angle 2 (i.e. Obs. #4-6). When using the duplication functionality, be sure to re-name each observation at roll angle 2 appropriately. In order to implement the roll dither between these observations, we will need to set special requirements, which we will get onto in a moment.
The TA parameters are determined from our advance work in ETC and CVT are applicable to all of our observations (i.e. Acq Filter = FND, Acq Readout Pattern = FAST, Acq Groups/ Ints = 45 and Acq Quadrant = 1), and so can be entered as such into the "Target Acquisition Parameters" section of each template. For the "Coronagraphic parameters" section, the coronagraphic mask/filter is to be selected – for MIRI, these are directly associated. The exposure time can then be entered for each science observation according to advanced work in the ETC. As mentioned in the paragraph previously, the observation templates associated with roll angle 2 (Obs. #4-5) should be duplicates/ identicle to the observation templates associated with roll angle 1 (Obs. #1-3).
For our reference star observations however, we were required by the ETC to define a reference target with identicle photometric propperties (i.e. a copy of) our science target. As such, the exposure parameters we obtained from the ETC will need to be scaled according to the propperties of our actual PSF reference target. Because our PSF star is 0.4 mag brighter than our science target (45%; checked at both 2MASS and WISE bands), we adjust the integration time to be 1/1.45 (i.e. ~0.68) times as long in each filter to acheive similar peak count per integertion in the PSF star as our science target. Since we are using the SGD technique, we select the "9-POINT-SMALL-GRID" as our dither type. This causes our exposure time to be increased by a factor of 9; thus we reduce the number of ints per dither position by half in order to keep the total exposure time from becoming excessive (where "excessive" is taken to mean PSF exposure time is more than twice the total on-source science exposure time summed across the two rolls). Since the full set of PSF calibrator dither positions is combined to generate the KLIP eigenbasis, we do not need to acheive the same SNR per each individual dither position as on the science target. Specifically we expect the SNR of the PSF relative to the science target to be between 1/sqrt(2), for individual dither positions, and 3*sqrt(2) for the combined KLIP reference librarly mean PSF mode — this will of course have to be assessed in practice.
The final section of the observation templates, labled "PSF Reference Observations", is where we will explicitely set the links between PSF reference observations and science observations to be used in data processing. First, we go through each of the observation templates with which our PSF reference star is the target (i.e. Obs. #7-9) and indicate that they are a PSF reference observations by marking the "This is a PSF reference Observation" checkbox. Then, for each of the dedicated science target observations (i.e. Obs. #1-6), we make an appropriate selection from the "PSF reference observations" list, indicating the observation that should be used for PSF subtraction in the data-processsing system. Associations should be pretty straightforward to make because (1) we clearly labled which observations are PSF references (so won't accidently select a science observation) and (2) the APT only displays observations with matching coronagraphs/ filters within this list (so we won't accidently select a PSF reference observation in the wrong filter).
In order to furfill the guidelines of our Observing Strategy, our program requires the placement of special requirements (SR). These requirements can be placed on the observations through their templates. The SRs placed on our program are as follows:
- All observations shall be grouped by a "Sequence, Non-Interruptible" SR to ensure the observations execute together and in the order provided, to (1) minimize possible thermal variations differentially affecting the acquired PSFs and (2) to minimize the number of rolls and slews.
- Because we are performing a roll dither on our science targets, we place an "Aperture PA offset" SR between the two science observations in each filter to the range 11 to 12 degree, which is near the maximum available roll. With observation 4 for example, we set an "Aperture PA offset 4 from 1 by 11 to 12 degrees (same offsets in V3)"; then observation 5 will be offset from observation 2 and so on. (Given the "Same PA as" SR below, it may seem redundant to repeat this for all 3 filters, however leaving it off any of them produces a warning in APT.)
- In order to ensure consistent positioning of the target in all 3 filters, we place a "Same PA as" SR linking the 3 science observations at each roll angle. In other words, each observation at roll 1 will have "Same Aperture PA as 1, 2, 3" and each observation at roll angle 2 have "Same Aperture PA as 4, 5, 6". This also slightly increases observational efficiency by avoiding rolls between those visits.
In order to position the companion in quadrant 2, well away from the 4QPM boundaries, we set an absolute "Aperture PA Range" SR to the range 165-–175 degree for Observation 1. Putting roll 1 near PA~170 also yields good target positioning in roll 2 as well after applying the offset SR. The ten degree range yields about a 10 day scheduling window.
Once the observations for our coronagraphic sequence have been fully specified, we are able to run the APT Visit Planner and ensure that our sequence is able to execute in its entirety. Upon verifying the scheduability of our program, we run the Smart Accounting tool on our observation folder. The tool will identify any excess major slews assumed by APT and reduce them to the minimum needed. Because our set of observations is in a non-interruptible sequence, it will obviously only need one major slew at the beginning of the sequence. Smart Accounting will catch and correct this, thus reducing our reported overheads.
Returning to the Visit planner, it is by selecting the observation folder that we can see how this time is explicelty split up between visits. While we inspect the program overheads, we draw your attention towards the order in which we chose to perform our observations. We chose a strategy in which we sequentially exposed in all 3 filters before spacecraft maneouvers in order to maximise efficiency by minimizing the number of slews. However, depending on the outcome of in-flight stability tests, we may find that other strategies may be advantageous. Such an example would be to place PSF star observations between each the two science rolls; we find the delta time between these two orderings is negligble. We recommend that the user explores how altering the order of observations changes the overall program time (HINT: try grouping together the 3 observations in each filter!)
We conclude, that for this science case, the total time reported by the APT for this program is 7.85 hours; 2.84 hours of which is dedicated science time.
The associated APT File for this Science Use Case can be downloaded from the following link: GJ_758_MIRI_Coronagraphy.aptx
This page has no comments.