Some capabilities to simultaneously use more than one science instrument in parallel will be available for Cycle 1 JWST proposing. Additional instrument combinations will become available in future cycles.
Coordinated parallel observations are planned as part of a primary program, and are intended to amplify or supplement the primary science proposed in a given proposal. That is, the primary and parallel observations are planned together in a single program to accomplish the science goals, and hence are under the purview of a given proposal PI and science team.
In contrast, pure parallel observations are part of distinct, separate programs that use parallel observing slots derived from separate accepted proposals. Hence, pure parallel programs are separate proposals, have separate PIs and are selected independently from any primary programs they may be attached to. It is expected that many calibration observations will be accomplished by using pure parallel opportunities, but there will be some opportunities for pure parallel science observations as well.
There are a number of subtleties related to each of these modes of operation. For example, pure parallel observations are not permitted to impact or change the primary observations to which they are attached (with one exception described below), whereas coordinated parallel observations can be tailored to accommodate both the primary and parallel data sets since they are specified within a given proposal. (For example, dither patterns that work well with both instruments can be selected.) These subtleties are described below.
The goal of enabling parallel observing is to enhance the efficiency and science return of the JWST mission. However, users need to be aware that there are tradeoffs that need to be balanced. Hence, not every potential parallel observing opportunity can be used for science. One example is the limited data downlink capability available to the observatory. For example, running NIRCam by itself in certain readout modes for several hours can saturate the data volume that can be downlinked in a single contact, leaving no room for parallel data taking during that period. Another consideration (for pure parallels) is that many calibration activities need to use pure parallel observing slots, and parallel calibration activities take precedence over pure parallel science.
Only certain modes and combinations of instruments will be allowed for cycle 1 proposals. Additional combinations will be made available in future observing cycles.
Policies for the use of parallel observing with JWST
A detailed description of the policies related to JWST parallel observing is available. In summary, there are 3 principles that govern the policies for proposing and planning parallel observations:
- For coordinated parallels, the science goals of the parallel observations must be tightly linked to the science goals of the overall program. In other words, accomplishing the main goals of the proposal requires the parallel observations, whether or not they are carried out in parallel. Coordinated parallels whose goal is to address ancillary topics will generally not be approved.
- Pure parallel observations may not impact the primary observations they are attached to.
- The needs of the JWST calibration program, a large fraction of which takes place in parallel mode, take precedence over pure parallel science programs.
As a practical matter, adding pure parallels will add a small additional overhead for setting up the instruments. This will be handled by the scheduling system and will not be assessed post-facto as an overhead on the primary observations. Further discussion of policies can be found in the Call for Proposals.
See also: JWST APT Coordinated Parallel Observations for details of APT implementation.
Coordinated parallel observations are crafted within the APT template used for the primary instrument mode. Five template combinations, supported for cycle 1 observations, are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Five template combinations supported for ERS and cycle 1 observations
|Ref. no.||First (Primary) template||Second (Parallel) template||Comments|
|Either template can be selected as primary, with the other as parallel.|
|2||NIRCam imaging1||NIRISS WFSS||Either template can be selected as primary, with the other as parallel.|
|3||MIRI imaging||NIRISS WFSS||Either template can be selected as primary, with the other as parallel.|
|4||NIRCam imaging1||NIRISS imaging||NIRCam must be primary. Use to increase areal coverage, but note NIRISS differences in pixel size and available filters.|
|5||NIRSpec MOS||NIRCam imaging||NIRSpec MOS must be primary.|
1 Only direct imaging with standard narrow, medium, or broad band filters is allowed for NIRCam and MIRI observations in these coordinated parallel modes.
Instrument teams have worked with developers to provide several ways of scheduling joint observations in parallel, for instance, to designate one instrument as the primary, as shown in options 1–3 in Table 1.
One anticipated use case is to use both instruments at one epoch to observe adjacent areas of the sky, and to return at a second epoch when the instrument fields of view have rotated 180° on the sky. Users should obviously investigate the availability of the relevant position angles using the JWST target visibility tools since not all positions on the sky have the needed flexibility in available position angles to accommodate this strategy. Users should also be aware that background levels due to zodiacal emission and thermal emission from the telescope will change between two observations at different position angles. However, other science cases may not require such a "180° strategy" and can simply obtain observations (e.g., with NIRISS WFSS) of a nearby areal region to accompany NIRCam or MIRI primary imaging observations.
All dither patterns available for a given instrument template will also be available when it is selected as the primary instrument in coordinated parallel mode. However, you also have the option to select from sets of customized dither patterns that have been specifically designed to produce good results for both instruments simultaneously. The number and type(s) of such customized dither patterns available depends on the specific prime+parallel instrument mode combination.
Issues regarding data volume per downlink period should be considered by users, especially for options involving NIRCam. Because NIRCam observations involve up to 10 detectors (8 short wavelength and 2 long wavelength), proposers of coordinated parallel programs may need to consider selecting readout patterns that are less data-intensive than they might otherwise choose. (Some of the most data intensive readout patterns for NIRCam are actually disallowed by APT in parallel mode.) Alternatively, depending on the science use case, a user may decide that areal coverage is less important than the parallel coverage and may opt to use only one of the two NIRCam modules. APT will compute and display the data volume for each exposure, and you can adjust the detector readout pattern and/or the number of modules being read out as needed to stay within the allowed limits.
A number of additional coordinated parallel options are being planned for future cycles, including the possibility of using up to 3 instruments simultaneously.
See also: JWST APT Pure Parallel Observations for details of APT implementation.
Unlike coordinated parallels, pure parallel observations are proposed as entirely separate programs of investigation. Pure parallels use parallel observing slots created by observations of programs that do not use coordinated parallels. Pure parallel observations will not be allowed to influence the dither patterns or other aspects of the observing strategy of the primary observations to which they are attached, since the primary observations will belong to entirely separate science proposals.
Not all template combinations will be supported in cycle 1 (pure parallel observations were not offered for ERS programs and GTO observations). Table 2 shows the priority order for template combinations that are currently expected to be available in Cycle 1. It is likely that the first section will be available in cycle 1, and the second priority group may or may not make it into cycle 1 usage. Table 3 lists other template combinations that may be considered for implementation in later cycles.
Table 2. Priority order for template combinations that are currently being worked
Pure parallel template
1Note: The NIRISS WFSS mode requires direct imaging observations along with the dispersed Grism spectral data, and the acquisition of these direct images in pure parallel mode needs to be different from the way they are taken in regular or coordinated parallel proposals. As of the Cycle 1 Call for Proposals release (Nov. 30, 2017), pure parallel versions of the templates of these modes have not yet been implemented in APT. Hence, accepted proposals requesting these modes will be on a shared risk basis, pending the implementation and testing of those templates.
Table 3. Combinations of modes not allowed in cycle 1 but possibly to be allowed in cycle 2 based on future assessments and development
Pure parallel template
|12||MIRI imaging||NIRCam WFSS|
|16||NIRCam WFSS||MIRI imaging|
|17||NIRCam WFSS||NIRISS WFSS|
NIRSpec fixed slit
NIRSpec fixed slit
NIRSpec fixed slit
NIRSpec fixed slit
Templates that will never be allowed to have pure parallels attached are the following: NIRCam Time Series, NIRCam Grism Time Series, MIRI coronagraphy, MIRI MRS, MIRI LRS, NIRCam coronagraphs, NIRSpec Bright Object Time Series, NIRISS AMI, and NIRISS SOSS. (Note: NIRISS Imaging is not offered as a primary mode.)
JWST APT Coordinated Parallel Observations
JWST APT Pure Parallel Observations
Custom Dithers for Coordinated Parallel Observations
JWST Science Parallel Observation Policies and Guidelines
JWST Acronyms and Abbreviations